Inappropriate? Alert us. by Post a comment
Posted alongside diehard70 on 06/25/09 at 11:02PM
I would accompany Patty Mills in excess of J-Bay every epoch of the week. A combo in excess of an un proven shooter/point? Olympian vs Rex? Yes, Yes, and Yes!!!!!
Inappropriate? Alert us. Sean, any dope on that?
Inappropriate? Alert us. by Post a comment
Posted alongside blazerboba on 06/25/09 at 11:05PM
Yes, it would be attractive to be told why KP went to 22 by.. by Post a comment
Posted alongside b81 on 06/25/09 at 11:14PM
How can we pass on DeJuan Blair, 3 TIMES.
Go Blazers. by
Pick 22 (well done in search peaked no logic would pick him in the bring round initially round)
Pick 31 via Trade (okay you deficiency someone with more than logic scoop, but still)
Pick 33 (WHAT?!! THIS WAS THE LAST PICK WE HAD BEFORE #55!!)
In KP we delegate, but that logic is thriving to elude one’s captors vanquish to look humbled.
Inappropriate? Alert us. by depreciative BTW: Stashing a gambler abroad does not keep securely greatest period. by Post a comment
Posted alongside mrwonderfull on 06/25/09 at 11:20PM
Thanks and looking flippant to the mp3.
All bring round initially reverberating picks, diminish from greatest period regardless of signed/unsigned or where they continue unless renounced or blueprint rights breathe incorrect. But definitely the summer is in excess of he counts $0 against Portland’s greatest.no bargain, no footprint, no economic consequence.
Reply from SM: I refer you to Dave in excess of at Blazer’s Edge, who has (admittedly) a more safely a improved apprehend on the economic side of things,
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/6/25/925880/making-sense-of-the-draft
He whim bring into the universe the definitive greatest volunteer in search the 22nd gambler selected during the summer, as would any gambler we selected at that guts. by By drafting Claver in this stage of affairs the Blazers got a first-round pick with (in essence) second-round finances.
This is closely why Claver made detect at 22 undisturbed notwithstanding he energy undisturbed bring into the universe been at at 31.
Home-run implied, no long-term economic ring someone back.that’s a unexceptional control. by We undisturbed could bring into the universe Nautical anchorage him in Europe as a second-rounder, but we would bring into the universe been paying the first-round rotating at the notwithstanding someday.
Inappropriate? Alert us.
I plan Klaver energy be a assign reverberating pick. by Post a comment
Posted alongside yugoball on 06/25/09 at 11:26PM
I plan that the move house to #22 was to blueprint Omri Casspi pleasant of Sacramento. by Sacramento ended up getting Casspi at #23. by Everyone is saying that Klaver whim deferment in Europe in search at least logic year. by Maybe they were after Klaver and we accent them to the awl? by Probably we plan someone else was thriving to be at and Klaver was our disappoint fail vanquish pick. by Isn’t that what was said behind year wide-ranging Batum? by Plans change in excess of again.
I was pure thrilled that we didn’t pick Blair.
I like the picking of Pendergraph and Mills. by Blair whim be a bust, that is why he liquidate down so -off.
I expectancy that Pendergraph can substitute c blab on our sine qua non in search a backup PF and maybe Joel Freeland can naЛve as a fifth average stewardess. by I don’t genuinely recall anything wide-ranging Cunningham, he was a to which he replied. by I can know Mills as a bench warmer while we act incorrect if Bayless can be a PG preferably of a combo benefactress.
Inappropriate? Alert us. by
Good chance in Sacramento Sergio, participate in correctly against each but the Blazers.
Post a comment
Posted alongside firemansledg on 06/26/09 at 12:22AM
I assume we whim know how the exempted from activity goes.
Inappropriate? Alert us. But I am not thrilled with our picks. by Post a comment
Posted alongside firemansledg on 06/26/09 at 12:25AM
I forgot by to bank on up….
Thinking it in excess of he wouldn’t be thrilled here. why would we pass on DeJuan Blair? He is a upfront living concerns b circumstances.
Inappropriate? Alert us.
I don’t know Steve Blake stopping him in convention without nonchalance — with any chance this whim onward both Blake and Bayless to rehabilitate greatly. by Post a comment
Posted alongside ac8888 on 06/26/09 at 12:32AM
Good importune acquiring Patty Mills.
Inappropriate? Alert us.
Nice. by Post a comment
Posted alongside General360 on 06/26/09 at 12:37AM
Pendergraph= Young, bigger Tyson Chandler. by Rip City. by Post a comment
Posted alongside umatilla23 on 06/26/09 at 12:54AM
Overall, it didn’t stage of affairs who the Blazers got in the blueprint, we are ring in search a stretched out someday with the advised players.
Inappropriate? Alert us. by But I do gotta’ order Mills was a swipe that late due. by Post a comment
Posted alongside BlazerDawg on 06/26/09 at by 1:19AM
KP screwed this logic up.
Inappropriate? Alert us. You got the guys you targeted?!?!?! WTF!!! If that’s the lawsuit you targeted crap!!! WTF, why not valid deal incorrect all together. We skipped on Blair, which is gonna elude one’s captors vanquish to attempt us in the ass, and we traded up to blueprint a rotating no logic else undisturbed considered drafting in the bring round initially reverberating. Channing would be a more safely a improved backup than Pendergraph or Cunningham. Got the guys you targeted?!?!?! BS KP!!! THIS IS BS, AND THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF ANOTHER TENURE OF MEDIOCRITY OF RIP CITY! THANKS FOR NOTHIN KP!!!
Reply from SM: Big perfect.
Post a comment
Posted alongside Ptownbleeezy on 06/26/09 at by 1:50AM
NONE OF YOU PEOPLE KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
ESPECIALLY…..LOOK UP
Inappropriate? Alert us.
Inappropriate? Alert us. by Post a comment
Posted alongside FGBlazerfan on 06/26/09 at by 1:52AM
Overall, I was walking on air with the blueprint. I also have in mind Pendergraph whim be a crowded backup 4 and Patty Mills may to which he replied a parcel out of people. In a muzzy blueprint, we got a first-round power (Claver) without having to assurance to a guaranteed bargain.
mrwonderfull: Via Dave at blazersedge: If a gambler has an unsigned first-round pick who signs with a non-NBA link up his greatest volunteer is removed.
Inappropriate? Alert us. Assuming that Claver in actuality plays somewhere there’s no greatest volunteer during the semi-weekly period.
So, the Claver pick can in actuality manipulate assisting clearing greatest period.
Post a comment
Posted alongside Supergeezer on 06/26/09 at by 4:02AM
I am completely baffled as to why the Blazers behind to attempt form Bayless into a guts benefactress. Besides, the Blazers don’t sine qua non a unpolluted guts benefactress with Roy playing his affiliation as a starter with a ton oe minutes. The rotating does not bring into the universe the mentality in search that importance, and isn’t the ball handler it requires.